Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Another geometric proof proceeds as follows: We start with the figure shown in the first diagram below, a large square with a smaller square removed from it. The side of the entire square is a, and the side of the small removed square is b. The area of the shaded region is . A cut is made, splitting the region into two rectangular pieces, as ...
Square number. Square number 16 as sum of gnomons. In mathematics, a square number or perfect square is an integer that is the square of an integer; [ 1] in other words, it is the product of some integer with itself. For example, 9 is a square number, since it equals 32 and can be written as 3 × 3 .
The square root of 2 (approximately 1.4142) is a real number that, when multiplied by itself or squared, equals the number 2. It may be written in mathematics as 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} or 2 1 / 2 {\displaystyle 2^{1/2}} .
Fermat's little theorem. In number theory, Fermat's little theorem states that if p is a prime number, then for any integer a, the number ap − a is an integer multiple of p. In the notation of modular arithmetic, this is expressed as. For example, if a = 2 and p = 7, then 27 = 128, and 128 − 2 = 126 = 7 × 18 is an integer multiple of 7 .
Every positive integer has a unique factorization into a square-free number r and a square number s 2. For example, 75,600 = 2 4 3 3 5 2 7 1 = 21 ⋅ 60 2. Let N be a positive integer, and let k be the number of primes less than or equal to N. Call those primes p 1, ... , p k. Any positive integer a which is less than or equal to N can then be ...
Least-upper-bound property. Every non-empty subset of the real numbers which is bounded from above has a least upper bound. In mathematics, the least-upper-bound property (sometimes called completeness, supremum property or l.u.b. property) [ 1] is a fundamental property of the real numbers. More generally, a partially ordered set X has the ...
The classic proof that the square root of 2 is irrational is a refutation by contradiction. [11] Indeed, we set out to prove the negation ¬ ∃ a, b ∈ . a/b = √ 2 by assuming that there exist natural numbers a and b whose ratio is the square root of two, and derive a contradiction.
In two dimensions, 2x 1 + 2x 2 is the perimeter of a rectangle with sides of length x 1 and x 2. Similarly, 4 √ x 1 x 2 is the perimeter of a square with the same area, x 1 x 2, as that rectangle. Thus for n = 2 the AM–GM inequality states that a rectangle of a given area has the smallest perimeter if that rectangle is also a square.