Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
The articles using this template were updated by an expert in the field, but are not textually identical to the corresponding externally peer-reviewed article. In other words, these articles were updated with content written by an academic expert while he/she was writing a peer-reviewed, subject-specific review (secondary source).
To start a new peer review, add {} to the article talk page, and follow the link this produces to create a peer review page for the article. The edit box will already contain the peer review page template, but with the topic blank. Feel free to fill in the topic as above.
Template:Review. Template. : Review. This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject. It is used when the article is not necessarily representing a blatant opinion or opinion piece, but is still overly judgemental in tone.
This adds a toolbox to peer review pages. It is based on Template:Featured article tools and uses tools developed by Dispenser and AndyZ. Usage. This is automatically included within new reviews because it is linked within Template:PR/subst. It is included with the syntax: {{Peer review tools|article name}} See also. Template:Featured article tools
This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:Academic-written review Purge this page to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki ; see the HTML comment " NewPP limit report " in the rendered page.
This is a documentation subpage for Template:Review. It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject.
B-class review. It is suitably referenced, with in-line citation: ; It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious holes: ; It has a defined structure: ; It is reasonably well-written: