Housing Watch Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hustler Magazine v. Falwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

    Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that parodies of public figures, even those intending to cause emotional distress, are protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution . In the case, Hustler magazine ran a ...

  3. Judicial opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_opinion

    Per curiam opinion. Seriatim opinion. v. t. e. A judicial opinion is a form of legal opinion written by a judge or a judicial panel in the course of resolving a legal dispute, providing the decision reached to resolve the dispute, and usually indicating the facts which led to the dispute and an analysis of the law used to arrive at the decision.

  4. Judicial review in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_the...

    In the United States, judicial review is the legal power of a court to determine if a statute, treaty, or administrative regulation contradicts or violates the provisions of existing law, a State Constitution, or ultimately the United States Constitution. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly define the power of judicial review, the ...

  5. Objection (United States law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objection_(United_States_law)

    Objection (United States law) In the law of the United States of America, an objection is a formal protest to evidence, argument, or questions that are in violation of the rules of evidence or other procedural law. Objections are often raised in court during a trial to disallow a witness 's testimony, and may also be raised during depositions ...

  6. Hope v. Pelzer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hope_v._Pelzer

    Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730 (2002), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the defense of qualified immunity, under which government actors may not be sued for actions they take in connection with their offices, did not apply to a lawsuit challenging the Alabama Department of Corrections's use of the "hitching post", a punishment whereby inmates were immobilized ...

  7. Federal judges allow Iowa book ban to take effect this school ...

    www.aol.com/news/federal-judges-allow-iowa-book...

    DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa can enforce a book ban this school year following a Friday ruling by a federal appeals court. The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a district judge's ...

  8. Dred Scott v. Sandford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

    Dred Scott v. Sandford, [a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that held the U.S. Constitution did not extend American citizenship to people of black African descent, and therefore they could not enjoy the rights and privileges the Constitution conferred upon American citizens.

  9. Legal challenge seeks to prevent RFK Jr. from appearing on ...

    www.aol.com/news/legal-challenge-seeks-prevent...

    The challenge to Clymer potentially appearing on the ballot claims he and his running mate should be disqualified because of an alleged failure to include required candidate affidavits.