Ad
related to: examples of credible sources for writingteacherspayteachers.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Free Resources
Download printables for any topic
at no cost to you. See what's free!
- Packets
Perfect for independent work!
Browse our fun activity packs.
- Assessment
Creative ways to see what students
know & help them with new concepts.
- Worksheets
All the printables you need for
math, ELA, science, and much more.
- Free Resources
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A source is where the material comes from. For example, a source could be a book or a webpage. A source can be reliable or unreliable for the material it is meant to support. Some sources, such as unpublished texts and an editor's own personal experience, are prohibited.
An issued patent may be considered a reliable source for the existence of the patent (or application), the names of the inventors, the date of the patent, and the overall content of what was invented. Government patent authorities, however, do not fact-check, edit or endorse any material in the patent application.
Reliable sources are those with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. They tend to have an editorial process with multiple people scrutinizing work before it is published. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected ...
Further information: WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and Otto Middleton (or why newspapers are dubious sources) (WP:OTTO) National and international journalism that is less than top-rated. Regional and local news ("Channel 5 news", local newspapers) Trade publications. Any source listed as green at WP:RSP would be at least in this tier.
This page in a nutshell: Ideal sources for biomedical material include literature reviews or systematic reviews in reliable, third-party, published secondary sources (such as reputable medical journals), recognised standard textbooks by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from national or international expert bodies.
For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
For web-only sources with no publication date, the "Retrieved" date (or the date you accessed the web page) should be included, in case the web page changes in the future. For example: Retrieved 15 July 2011 or you can use the access-date parameter in the automatic Wikipedia:refToolbar 2.0 editing window feature.
Ad
related to: examples of credible sources for writingteacherspayteachers.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month