Housing Watch Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    The following presents a non-exhaustive list of sources whose reliability and use on Wikipedia are frequently discussed. This list summarizes prior consensus and consolidates links to the most in-depth and recent discussions from the reliable sources noticeboard and elsewhere on Wikipedia.

  3. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    The Daily Currant – Satirical news originating on this site mistakenly ended up on a few US news sites. The Lapine – a satirical news site in Canada; Newslo.com and Politicalo.com – satirical articles based on actual events that provide a button readers can use to highlight the portions of an article that are real

  4. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Criteria for evaluating reliability. The reliability of Wikipedia articles can be measured by the following criteria: Vandalism of a Wikipedia article. The section on the left is the normal, undamaged version; and on the right is the vandalized, damaged version. Accuracy of information provided within articles.

  5. Media bias in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_bias_in_the_United...

    Claims of media bias in the United States generally focus on the idea of media outlets reporting news in a way that seems partisan. Other claims argue that outlets sometimes sacrifice objectivity in pursuit of growth or profits. Some academics in fields like media studies, journalism, communication, political science and economics have looked ...

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Overview. Source reliability falls on a spectrum: No source is 'always reliable' or 'always unreliable' for everything. However, some sources provide stronger or weaker support for a given statement. Editors must use their judgment to draw the line between usable and inappropriate sources for each statement.

  7. Journalism ethics and standards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and...

    Journalism. Journalistic ethics and standards comprise principles of ethics and good practice applicable to journalists. This subset of media ethics is known as journalism's professional " code of ethics" and the "canons of journalism". [ 1] The basic codes and canons commonly appear in statements by professional journalism associations and ...

  8. Source criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism

    Source criticism. Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant.

  9. Parsing the polls: How to judge the validity, credibility of ...

    www.aol.com/news/parsing-polls-judge-validity...

    We are a little more than 80 days now from the U.S. presidential election, and voters are about to hear a lot more about polling. But what should you really look for in a poll? We explain.