Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Criminal Code ( French: Code criminel) is a law that codifies most criminal offences and procedures in Canada. Its official long title is An Act respecting the Criminal Law (French: Loi concernant le droit criminel ), [1] and it is sometimes abbreviated as Cr.C. (French: C.Cr.) in legal reports. [2] Section 91 (27) of the Constitution Act ...
Offence of contempt of court and section 127 of the Criminal Code – – R v Venneri 2012 SCC 33 : Criminal organizations under s. 467 of the Criminal Code and whether possession of cocaine was a foreseeable consequence of conspiring to traffic in cocaine – Unanimous: R v Punko 2012 SCC 39 : Issue estoppel – – R v Knott 2012 SCC 42
R v Lucas is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the criminal offence of defamatory libel. The Court held that the Criminal Code offence of defamatory libel infringed the constitutional protection of freedom of expression under Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but the offence was a reasonable limit prescribed by law under Section 1 of the Charter.
The criminal law of Canada is under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the Parliament of Canada. The power to enact criminal law is derived from section 91 (27) of the Constitution Act, 1867. Most criminal laws have been codified in the Criminal Code, as well as the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Youth Criminal Justice Act and ...
Blasphemous libel was originally an offence under the common law of England. Today, it is an offence under the common law of Northern Ireland, but has been abolished in England and Wales, and repealed in Canada and New Zealand. It is a form of criminal libel that consists of the publication of material which exposes the Christian religion to ...
R v Vaillancourt, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 636, is a landmark case from the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the Criminal Code concept of "constructive murder". ". The Court raised the possibility that crimes with significant "stigma" attached, such as murder, require proof of the mens rea element of subjective foresight of death, but declined to decide on that b
R v Gladue was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada which represented the court’s first opportunity to interpret section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code. This decision focused on the overrepresentation of Indigenous Peoples in jails and held this overrepresentation was “a crisis in the Canadian criminal justice system.”
R v Seaboyer, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 577 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court struck-down a rape-shield provision of the Criminal Code as it violated the right to "full answer and defence" under sections 7 and 11 (d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The case was decided with R v Gayme .