Ad
related to: how to determine credible resources for writing articles on human
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the English Wikipedia, verifiability means people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than editors' beliefs, opinions, experiences, or previously unpublished ideas or information.
Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication.
Street credibility or "street cred" (also referred to as "the word on the street") is the degree to which someone's word can be believed by a typical person, the "person on the street". [33] Corporations have gone through their own ways of getting street credibility; however, it goes by a different name: branding.
Resources. Wikipedia:Guide to addressing bias. Shortcuts. WP:ADDBIAS. WP:FIXBIAS. This page in a nutshell: A guide for editors and readers who want to fix the bias of an article on Wikipedia. Sometimes, you will come across a Wikipedia article that seems to have a serious point-of-view problem. It reads as a biased diatribe against the subject ...
e. All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view ( NPOV ), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. NPOV is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia and of other Wikimedia ...
A newspaper article is a primary source if it reports events, but a secondary source if it analyses and comments on those events". [3] "In the humanities, age is an important factor in determining whether an article is a primary or secondary source. A recently published journal or newspaper article on the Brown v.
This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...
t. e. Wikipedia can be a great tool for learning and researching information. However, as with all tertiary reference works, Wikipedia is not considered to be a reliable source as not everything in Wikipedia is accurate, comprehensive, or unbiased. Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is intended to provide an overview of topics and indicate ...
Ad
related to: how to determine credible resources for writing articles on human