Housing Watch Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of statements by major scientific organizations about ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_statements_by...

    This is a list of statements by major scientific organizations about climate change, that have issued formal statements of opinion, classifies those organizations according to whether they concur with the IPCC view (i.e. the scientific consensus on climate change ), are non-committal, or dissent from it. The California Governor's Office website ...

  3. Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on...

    A 2019 review of scientific papers found the consensus on the cause of climate change to be at 100%, [ 6] and a 2021 study concluded that over 99% of scientific papers agree on the human cause of climate change. [ 7] The small percentage of papers that disagreed with the consensus often contained errors or could not be replicated.

  4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergovernmental_Panel_on...

    UNFCCC. WMO. UNEP. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) is an intergovernmental bodyof the United Nations. Its job is to advance scientific knowledge about climate changecaused by human activities.[1] The World Meteorological Organization(WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP) set up the IPCC in 1988.

  5. Wikipedia:WikiProject Climate change/Style guide - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    A proposed outline for articles on climate change in specific geographies, including countries or sub-national states is shown below (for example articles in Category:Climate change in the United States by state, Category:Climate change by country). Use only those subheadings where you have relevant information.

  6. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  7. Net zero emissions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_zero_emissions

    Net zero claims vary enormously in how credible they are, but most have low credibility despite the increasing number of commitments and targets. [14] While 61% of global carbon dioxide emissions are covered by some sort of net zero target, credible targets cover only 7% of emissions. This low credibility reflects a lack of binding regulation.

  8. Climate change - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change

    Climate change. Changes in surface air temperature over the past 50 years. [ 1] The Arctic has warmed the most, and temperatures on land have generally increased more than sea surface temperatures. Earth's average surface air temperature has increased almost 1.5 °C (about 2.5 °F) since the Industrial Revolution.

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources.