Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...
Active. Media Bias/Fact Check ( MBFC) is an American website founded in 2015 by Dave M. Van Zandt. [1] It considers four main categories and multiple subcategories in assessing the "political bias" and "factual reporting" of media outlets [2] [3], relying on a self-described "combination of objective measures and subjective analysis". [4] [5]
Scholarly journals[edit] See also: WP:CITEWATCH. Scholarly journals are normally reliable sources, but some journals have a reputation for bias or unreliability. QuackWatch has a list of non-recommended periodicals, however, a short list of journals which should be used with extreme caution include:
The Baltimore Sun (1837) The Mining Journal (1841) The Plain Dealer (1842) Boston Herald (1846) The Chicago Tribune (1847) The Daily Standard (Celina, Ohio, 1848) Taunton Daily Gazette (1848) The Santa Fe New Mexican (1849, the oldest continuously published newspaper in the Southwestern and Western United States) Deseret News (1850)
test, she is judged not to have received a good education from the school. If the school does not make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) on student test scores, the school is considered not providing a good education to its students and is labeled ‘in need of improvement.’ The school then faces serious
Main article: Media bias. Claims of media bias generally focus on the idea of media outlets reporting news in a way that seems partisan. Other claims argue that outlets sometimes sacrifice objectivity in pursuit of growth or profits. Some academics in fields like media studies, journalism, communication, political science and economics have ...
Source reliability falls on a spectrum: No source is 'always reliable' or 'always unreliable' for everything. However, some sources provide stronger or weaker support for a given statement. Editors must use their judgment to draw the line between usable and inappropriate sources for each statement. independent always.
By Michael Martina and David Brunnstrom. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. should welcome more students from China, but to study the humanities rather than sciences, the second-ranked U.S. diplomat ...